Is NetJets Operating Under Part 135 Regulations?

Is NetJets Part 135? Understanding the Regulatory Framework

I was at a fractional ownership event a few years back, chatting with a pilot who flew for NetJets. Someone asked him a straightforward question: “So you guys fly Part 135, right?” His answer took about ten minutes because, as it turns out, nothing in aviation is ever as simple as it sounds.

NetJets Overview

NetJets essentially invented fractional jet ownership back in 1964, which probably should have been led with, honestly. The concept was revolutionary: instead of buying an entire aircraft (and dealing with all the associated headaches), you could purchase a share and get guaranteed access to private jet travel. Today, NetJets operates one of the largest private jet fleets in the world.

Understanding FAA Regulations

The Federal Aviation Administration divides its regulations into multiple “Parts,” each governing different types of operations. For private jet operators, the two most relevant are Part 91 and Part 135. Understanding the distinction matters because it affects everything from pilot training requirements to maintenance schedules to what you can legally charge passengers.

Part 135 Explained

Part 135 governs commercial air operations – specifically, commuter and on-demand flight services. If you’re paying for a charter flight, that operator is almost certainly flying under Part 135. The requirements are stringent: enhanced pilot qualifications, rigorous maintenance protocols, regular FAA oversight, and detailed operational procedures.

Operators need an Air Carrier Certificate from the FAA. Getting one isn’t trivial – it requires demonstrating operational competence, having proper management structures, and maintaining ongoing compliance. The rules exist because when you’re flying paying passengers, the stakes are higher and the safety expectations follow.

Part 91 Explained

Part 91 covers general operating rules for most aircraft in the United States. It’s less restrictive than Part 135 because it primarily applies to private, non-commercial operations. If you own an airplane and fly it for your own purposes, you’re operating under Part 91.

NetJets’ Compliance

Here’s where it gets interesting: NetJets operates under both Part 91 and Part 135, depending on the specific flight.

When fractional owners use their share – flying on aircraft they partially own – those flights typically operate under Part 91. The owner isn’t hiring a charter service; they’re using their own aircraft with professional crew.

When NetJets provides on-demand charter services to non-owners, those flights operate under Part 135. Different rules, different requirements, same aircraft and same high standards.

That’s what makes NetJets’ regulatory compliance endearing to aviation lawyers and regulators alike – they’ve built a system that accommodates both frameworks while maintaining safety standards that often exceed either set of requirements.

Operational Differences

The practical differences between Part 135 and Part 91 include pilot rest requirements, maintenance inspection intervals, crew training mandates, and operational control structures. Part 135 operations face more frequent audits and tighter operational constraints.

NetJets, regardless of which regulatory framework applies to a specific flight, maintains consistent high standards across their fleet. Their internal policies often exceed regulatory minimums, which is why safety-conscious travelers choose them.

Pilot Requirements

Part 135 requires Airline Transport Pilot (ATP) certificates for pilots in command – the highest level of pilot certification. Part 91 has lower minimums, but NetJets hires experienced pilots regardless and puts them through training programs that exceed regulatory requirements.

That pilot I talked to at the fractional ownership event mentioned he’d done more simulator time at NetJets than at his previous airline job. The company doesn’t cut corners on training.

Maintenance Standards

Aircraft maintenance under Part 135 follows stricter inspection schedules than Part 91 minimums. NetJets maintains their entire fleet to these higher standards, providing consistency regardless of how a particular flight is categorized.

Safety Protocols

Safety management systems, regular audits, crew resource management training, fatigue risk management – NetJets implements comprehensive safety programs across their operations. They’ve invested heavily in building a safety culture that serves both fractional owners and charter customers.

Client Services

From the customer’s perspective, the regulatory distinction might seem like inside baseball. What matters is that the aircraft arrives on time, the crew is professional, and the flight is safe and comfortable. NetJets delivers on those expectations whether you’re an owner using your share or a client booking a charter.

Business Model

The fractional ownership model that NetJets pioneered solves real problems. Full aircraft ownership involves substantial capital costs, crew management, maintenance oversight, and regulatory compliance – headaches that most busy executives would rather avoid. Fractional ownership provides private jet access without the operational burden.

The on-demand charter service extends NetJets’ reach to clients who want occasional private jet travel without any ownership commitment. Different service, same quality execution.

Environmental Considerations

Private aviation faces legitimate environmental criticism. NetJets has responded with fuel efficiency initiatives, sustainable aviation fuel programs, and carbon offset options. Whether these efforts are sufficient is debatable, but the company is clearly engaging with environmental concerns rather than ignoring them.

Summary

So is NetJets Part 135? Yes, for some flights. They’re also Part 91 for others. The regulatory framework depends on the specific operation, but NetJets’ commitment to safety, service, and professionalism remains consistent regardless of which set of rules technically applies. That’s probably the answer that pilot was trying to give, just in fewer words.

Additional Reading


Related Articles

Continue exploring:

Michael Thompson

Michael Thompson

Author & Expert

Michael covers military aviation and aerospace technology. With a background in aerospace engineering and years following defense aviation programs, he specializes in breaking down complex technical specifications for general audiences. His coverage focuses on fighter jets, military transport aircraft, and emerging aviation technologies.

623 Articles
View All Posts